The following article co-authored by MVFHR
member, Susannah Sheffer and featuring the testimony of several MVFHR board members appeared in
the American Friends Service Committee's Peacework Magazine,
September 2005.
In April of this year, Governor Mitt Romney introduced a bill to
reinstate the death penalty in Massachusetts. Because Massachusetts is one
of only 12 states in the nation without the death penalty, abolitionists
around the country have always given close watch to reinstatement efforts
here. This year's effort drew particular attention because the governor
described his bill as "a gold standard for the death penalty in the modern
scientific age." He promised that his legislation addressed all the
concerns that have prevented reinstatement bills from passing in recent
years.
In July, Massachusetts lawmakers
heard several hours of testimony about the bill, mostly from people who
opposed reinstatement ó including sheriffs, attorneys, DNA experts,
exonerated prisoners, and relatives of murder victims and execution
victims. Victims' family members Michael Avery, Bill Babbitt, Jamie
Bissonnette, Robert Curley, Renny Cushing, Loretta Filipov, Kate
Lowenstein, Robert Meeropol, and Bud Welch attended the hearings in order
to demonstrate their opposition to the death penalty. Here are excerpts
from some of their testimonies:

Loretta Filipov
"I have always been against the death penalty. Proponents of this bill
would tell me that I would feel very different if my family was affected.
Well, I can say that my family has been affected. My husband, Alexander
Filipov, was murdered when he was a passenger on American Airlines Flight
#11, on September 11, 2001. Friday, September 14, 2001 would have been our
44th wedding anniversary.
"My family and I would have liked nothing better than to have Mohammed
Atta and the other terrorists from Flight 11 brought to an open trial,
tried, and given 92 life sentences, one life sentence for each person
aboard that airplane. But he and the 14 other terrorists who murdered 3000
people on that day also killed themselves.
"We need to stop the cycle of violence. We can see from the present
course we are following in this country that violence only begets more
violence and killing only leads to more killing. It is possible to have
justice without revenge and hate.
"Revenge is not the answer. The death penalty is not the answer."

Renny Cushing
"I am speaking to you as the son of a murder victim. My father, Robert
Cushing, was shot to death on June 1, 1988 in front of my mother's eyes.
Many people assumed that my family and I wanted the death penalty for my
father's murderers, but we felt, and continue to feel, that the death
penalty would not bring us justice or healing.
"Murder is, of course, a violation of the most basic of human rights:
the right to life. I am the director of an organization called Murder
Victims' Families for Human Rights. Our members reject the premise that
society should redress one human rights violation with another. We call
upon society to act from a consistent human rights ethic in the aftermath
of violence.
"As a former two-term member of the House of Representatives in my home
state of New Hampshire, I have a special appreciation for the challenges
and demands that must be addressed by those who help enact the laws that
govern a society. For a lawmaker to take on the abolition of the death
penalty as a cause means that inevitably he or she will touch upon real
pain and devastation, and sometimes face criticism ó including the
criticism that opposing the death penalty is tantamount to opposing
victims. It's true that the issue of victims and the issue of the death
penalty are linked, and that linkage should be acknowledged and embraced.
During my time as a lawmaker I advocated for legislation that would
benefit victims of crime and at the same time I was a proponent of ending
the death penalty. I believe for an individual, for a society, to have a
consistent human rights ethic, it is necessary to be both pro-victim and
anti-death penalty."

Robert Meeropol
"I have a personal relationship with the death penalty. I'm Robert
Meeropol now, but I was born Robert Rosenberg. My birth parents, Ethel and
Julius Rosenberg, were executed in Sing Sing prison on
June 19, 1953, when I was six.
"As a child who survived his parents' execution and as an adult who
works with many children whose parents are in prison or, in one case, on
death row, I have an unusual perspective to share with you
I believe
you've heard little or no testimony about capital punishment from the
perspective of a child who has had one or both parents executed.
I
survived because a supportive community surrounded me, but what about
other children who do not have such a support system?
"This raises a disturbing question: If Massachusetts passes any death
penalty statute (and what a horrifyingly absurd concept our governor has
introduced ó a "gold standard" of killing), what will the impact be on
children whose immediate family members are executed or are placed on
death row? No one can deny that it is qualitatively worse to have a family
member on death row or executed than to have a family member in prison.
But that's not much of an answer. You must have a better answer to this
question, because, as legislators, you have a solemn obligation before
passing a law to understand its impact. That obligation becomes even more
serious when you are dealing with matters of life and death as you are
here.
"I believe most of you before me oppose this bill.
But for those of
you who are considering bringing back state-sanctioned, ritualized
killings in a gold wrapper, shouldn't you at least study this issue first?
It is past time to realize such 'collateral damage' is yet another
powerful reason to keep the death penalty out of Massachusetts."

Jamie Bissonnette
"In 1974, two of my cousins were killed. My cousin Pedro Bissonnette
was a mentor to all of us. He believed that civil rights extended to
Native people and founded the Oglala Sioux Civil Rights Organization. He
was a humble man who sat with the elders and learned from them before he
made any decisions on action. He was a traditional Lakota leader. Ten days
before he was to testify at a trial, he was shot five times at a two- or
three-foot range, with bullets piercing his hands as they rose to his
chest to protect himself. No one was ever convicted of this crime even
though it was well-known who shot him and why he was shot.
"I have done dedicated criminal justice work in my own communities, the
tribes in New England. I do this work because I believe we have to be
about solving problems, building peace, and establishing balance. These
three things are justice. The death penalty is not."

Bill Babbitt
"The Bridgewater State Hospital here in Massachusetts diagnosed my
brother Manny as paranoid schizophrenic. In 1980, after he was released
from Bridgewater, Manny came to live with me and my wife in Sacramento. We
gave him money and tried to help him get work. But I was worried. He was
acting strange. I saw that his demons were coming to the surface.
"When I began to suspect that Manny had been involved in the death of a
local woman, I couldn't live with that. I went to the police and told them
what I suspected. They promised me that Manny would get the help he
needed. I agreed to help lead them to Manny. After they arrested Manny, an
officer said to him, "You're not going to go to the gas chamber or
anything like that."
"I believed that. My mother believed it. We never really thought he
would be executed, right up until the last half hour when I watched my
brother be put to death at San Quentin on May 4, 1999.
"For the rest of my life I have to live with the fact that I turned my
brother in and that led to his death. I turned him in because I was so
afraid that Manny's demons would lead to more killing. I didn't want there
to be more victims. What I want you to understand is that executions
create more victims, too.
"I wish we had been able to get Manny the help he needed. I wish
that as a society we would devote our resources to treating people like
Manny instead of devoting those resources to imposing the death penalty
and creating more funerals, more grief.
"I've always been proud that my home state doesn't have the death
penalty. I plead with you to keep it that way. In the name of the families
that executions leave behind, I ask you not to bring the death penalty to
Massachusetts."
Reframing the Death Penalty
A few words about the work of Murder Victims' Families for Human
Rights: In addition to bringing the perspective of victims' family members
to the death penalty debate, Murder Victims' Families for Human Rights
seeks to reframe the death penalty as a human rights issue rather than a
criminal justice issue. When the death penalty is viewed as a criminal
sanction, it can be defended on the grounds that governments have the
right to impose criminal sanctions as they deem appropriate. When the
death penalty is viewed as a human rights violation, this defense doesn't
hold up. By definition, human rights can not be either granted or denied
by a government. MVFHR asserts that the death penalty clearly violates the
most basic of human rights -- the right to life -- and that no matter what
are the assumptions and policies of its criminal justice system, a nation
should not be allowed to take the lives of its own citizens.